At Sozo Firm, your feedback is always welcome. Drop us a note anytime or call us at (800) 460-SOZO.

Google’s search hold keeps rising

In the month of April 2008, 67.9% of all U.S. searches were “owned” by Google.  This is a 2.6% increase from last April. Yahoo held its ground at just over 20.28%, losing almost 1/2 % since last year.  MSN dropped from 7.77% to 6.26% (no wonder Microsoft is desperate to woo Yahoo), and Ask continues to gain ground, growing from 3.69% to 4.17%.  Though Ask is still the small player, 4.17% of US searches is nothing to look down upon, especially when you consider that the other 45 search engines considered in this latest Hitwise study accounted for a mere 1.40% of US searches.

Search Engine                  April 2007                       April 2008
Google                                  65.26%                            67.90%
Yahoo                                   20.73%                           20.28%
MSN                                     7.77%                              6.26%
Ask                                       3.69%                              4.17% 

How does this affect the average business?  I’d recommend a comparable division of your search engine optimization & search marketing dollars in regards to addressing each engine.

Search engine optimization:

Google: obviously, Google is king, and he continues to dominate, and no strategist sees that changing anytime soon. I would invest 75% of my SEO budget toward focusing on Google.

Yahoo: 20% of US traffic is too significant to overlook.  Companies that merely focus their search strategy on Google are forfeiting 20 visits out of 100.  Turn that into revenue and you’re missing 20 million for each 100 million you could be bringing in.  At the same time, there is a lot up in the air with Yahoo at this time with the stock at bottom and Microsoft pressuring them to budge.  I would invest 10% of my SEO budget toward Yahoo at this time.

MSN: Unless something unexpected happens with Yahoo/MSN, it sure looks like MSN’s hold in the search world will continue to drop.  The only reasons they’ve held on so long is because they’re the default search engine for Internet Explorer and many people still use the MSN homepage and have MSN related email (including Hotmail/Live mail).  I would invest 7.5% into MSN/Live.

Ask: You’ve got to admit, even if you’ve been holding out on this one.  Ask is making some significant gains here for a small search engine that just won’t give up.  If they make some modifications to their home page appearance (face it–they plaster their home page with sponsored search because they need the cash desperately right now) and continue ingeniously coming up with more options to give their searchers (they’ve been doing well so far), I predict Ask will soon bypass Microsoft and may even grow past them.  It will take some major reworking on their part to do that, though. But, they have some nice traffic and I wouldn’t ignore them.  A small fraction of traffic like that still can give your site a major boost, especially if you rank well for a competitive term in a small search engine like MSN or Ask.  I’d give them 7.5% of my SEO budget.

Search Engine Marketing

Google: 66% of the SEM budget.

Yahoo: 20% of the SEM budget.

MSN: 10% of the SEM budget.

Ask: Lousy ads all over.  I’d much rather invest the cash into SEO for Ask rather than the ads; but, we’ll go with 4% of the SEM budget.

Just looking at these brief search engine traffic stats, you can see why it is so crucial to place the heavy artillery into your Google marketing portfolio. To rank well in Yahoo and MSN but to fare poorly in Google is to completely miss the mark. But, at the same time, for a company to boast about its performance in Google while lacking completely in Yahoo, MSN & Ask is like a student boasting about getting a 67% on their report card. Do your homework carefully, then plan a strategy that has potential for success.

Posted in Web Marketing on May 22nd, 2008, 5:52 am by Sozo Firm Staff   

No comments yet. Be the first.

Leave a reply